Veritas Silentii

Veritas Silentii Conversations Across Time

Conversations Across Time

Conversation No. 1 · August 2026

Machiavelli's Forgotten Lessons

What a Renaissance statesman can still teach us about power in the Agentic Age.

By J. Kimball

"Borrow intelligence. Never mortgage your future to it."

Most people know Niccolò Machiavelli as the author of The Prince. Few realize he wrote it only after watching his own career — and the political system that sustained it — collapse around him. Even fewer know why he wrote about it.

Like many professionals today, Machiavelli spent years building a successful career inside an established institution. He was not a philosopher looking in from the outside. During the early sixteenth century, he was one of Florence's senior diplomats and civil servants, negotiating with kings, popes, and military commanders during one of the most turbulent periods in Renaissance Italy.

Then, almost overnight, the world he knew disappeared.

The Republic of Florence collapsed. A new regime took power. Machiavelli lost his position, was arrested, imprisoned, and tortured on suspicion of conspiracy. When he was finally released, he returned to his family property outside Florence with little reason to believe he would ever return to public life.

Many professionals today recognize that feeling, born of growing uncertainty.

The technology is different. The politics are different. But the experience is surprisingly familiar. Institutions reorganize. Careers built over decades suddenly become uncertain. Rules that once seemed permanent begin quietly changing beneath our feet.

It was from that unexpected position — not as a powerful statesman, but as an experienced observer who had lived through institutional collapse — that Machiavelli wrote The Prince. He completed the work in 1513, partly while hoping to demonstrate his usefulness to Florence's new rulers and return to public life.

He was not simply asking how leaders gain power. He was trying to understand a deeper question.

Why do some people survive periods of profound change while others disappear with the systems that once sustained them?

Five hundred years later, that question may be more relevant than ever.

Lesson One: The Borrowed Army

Renaissance Italy was not a unified nation.

It was a patchwork of fiercely independent city-states — Florence, Venice, Milan, Naples, and the Papal States — constantly competing with one another while larger powers such as France and Spain intervened whenever it suited their own interests.

Few rulers possessed armies large enough to defend themselves against every threat.

The temptation was obvious. Why spend years building your own army when a powerful ally already had one?

That strategic temptation has not disappeared.

Only the armies have changed.

Today's professionals increasingly borrow capabilities from somewhere else. Artificial intelligence writes reports. Platforms provide audiences. The institutions that grant degrees and certifications lend credibility. Employers supply reputation. Specialists move rapidly between organizations, carrying knowledge that once remained inside a single company.

Just as Renaissance rulers borrowed military strength, modern professionals increasingly borrow intellectual and institutional strength.

Most of the time, that is entirely sensible. Machiavelli would probably have agreed.

What concerned him was something much deeper.

He had watched alliances succeed…and fail. Again and again.

That experience led him to make one of the most overlooked distinctions in The Prince.

He separated military forces into three categories:

Most readers assume mercenaries worried him most. They did not. Mercenaries fought for money. But auxiliary troops fought for someone else.

That difference changed everything.

If auxiliary troops lost, your state was defeated. But if they won, your victory belonged to another ruler's army.

Machiavelli's formulation was stark: lose with auxiliaries and you are ruined; win with them and you become dependent upon — or captive to — the power that delivered your victory. He therefore regarded success achieved through another ruler's forces as no real victory at all.

Either way, your future had become dependent upon power that was never truly yours. Machiavelli's warning was not really about armies. It was about dependence.

Five Hundred Years Later

The armies have changed, and today we call them by different names.

None of these new armies are enemies. Machiavelli would almost certainly have embraced them. He admired practical advantage wherever he found it.

What he distrusted was dependence upon capabilities that ultimately belonged to someone else.

That distinction feels remarkably relevant today.

While many professionals are becoming extraordinarily effective with AI, the more difficult question is whether they are becoming more capable…or simply more dependent.

Those are not the same thing.

You should borrow intelligence wherever and whenever you can. Use every tool available. Learn every new capability.

Just never confuse borrowed capability with capability that is truly your own. Because eventually the borrowed army goes home.

And then…

What remains truly yours?

Lesson Two: Power That Arrives Too Easily May Leave Just as Quickly

Machiavelli had watched ambitious men rise with extraordinary speed.

Some were elevated by family connections. Some by money. Some by a powerful patron. And some by what Machiavelli called fortuna — the unpredictable events that suddenly place opportunity in a person's hands.

From the outside, their rise looked enviable. They had avoided years of struggle. They had reached the summit quickly.

But Machiavelli noticed a problem. People who rose through someone else's favor often arrived before building the foundations required to remain there.

Their position rested on relationships they did not control. On armies they did not command. On goodwill that could be withdrawn. On circumstances that could change.

He used Cesare Borgia as one of his most revealing examples. Born in 1475, Cesare was the illegitimate son of Pope Alexander VI. His father first made him a cardinal, but backed by papal money and French allies, he soon had bigger plans — he resigned from the cardinalate so he could pursue military conquests instead. Through power largely acquired through the influence and the military support of his father, he rapidly conquered territory across Romagna and the Marche, earning a reputation along the way for calculated deception, decisive action, and cold brutality.

Machiavelli watched how energetically Borgia used these personal connections as his main support, and when they disappeared, much of his power disappeared with them.

Machiavelli viewed Cesare as representing political expediency in its purest form, and exploitation of personal connections also exposing the danger of power built on foundations controlled by someone else. When Pope Alexander VI died in 1503 and Julius II, a sworn enemy of the Borgias, became pope, Cesare's support collapsed. He lost his territories and influence, was imprisoned, escaped to Spain, and died in battle in 1507 at only thirty-one.

Cesare's life became both Machiavelli's model of decisive leadership and his warning about how quickly borrowed power can disappear.

Five hundred years later, we all know of professionals still rising through borrowed foundations.

A prestigious employer lends their reputation to their name. A senior sponsor opens doors. A title causes others to listen. A license delivers an audience. An algorithm begins recommending their work.

None of that is illegitimate. But none of it is necessarily permanent.

A professional can hold a powerful position without possessing portable power. They can be highly visible without owning the route through which people find them. They can appear authoritative while their authority remains attached primarily to the institution behind their name.

The danger appears only when circumstances change. And in the world today, change has already arrived.

Personal sponsors are retiring. Employers restructuring. Platforms changing their algorithm. Positions disappearing. And the sudden realization that all along the audience belonged to the institution.

Machiavelli's warning was not that people should reject fortunate opportunities. It was that they should use those opportunities to build foundations of their own before fortune changes direction.

Borrow the platform. Accept the title. Use access.

But before that door closes and locks quietly behind you, build something that can travel with you.

Lesson Three: Reputation Must Travel Before You Do

Renaissance Italy had no LinkedIn. No search engines. No social media. No artificial intelligence systems summarizing a leader's qualifications before anyone met him.

Yet Machiavelli understood that reputation shaped power long before direct experience could.

In his world, news moved between courts, diplomats carried stories, merchants repeated what they had heard. And those rumors and stories about military victories, political errors, courage, weakness, generosity, and betrayal all became part of the public identity surrounding a ruler.

A prince could not personally explain himself to every neighboring state. His reputation had to travel in his place.

In The Prince, Machiavelli argued that leaders earned esteem through visible accomplishments and actions that gave others clear evidence of their capacity.

He was not describing public relations in the modern sense. He was recognizing that power depends partly on whether other people can identify and understand the person behind their personal accomplishments.

That problem has not disappeared. But today it has become automated.

Before a recruiter speaks with you, software may already have evaluated your résumé. Before a client asks for a proposal, an AI system may have summarized the available experts. Before a colleague recommends you, your digital footprint may already have shaped what they believe you are qualified to do. Before an institution decides whether you possess authority, increasingly intelligent systems determine whether your name reaches the institution at all.

Your reputation now travels before you…through systems you may never see.

That does not mean every professional needs to become a public personality.

It means that invisible capability is becoming increasingly difficult for modern systems to recognize.

The question is no longer only: Can you do the work?

It is also: Can people — and the systems standing between you and them — understand what you are known for doing?

Machiavelli understood that reputation was not a substitute for capability. It was the route through which your capability became visible to others before they meet you.

Five centuries later, that route has become part of what Veritas Silentii calls the Agentic Gate.

Your reputation still travels before you. Only now, software may decide how far it gets.

Lesson Four: The Lion Is Not Enough

Machiavelli is often remembered as an advocate of force. But that is only half of what he wrote.

In one of the most famous passages of The Prince, he argued that a ruler had to understand both the lion and the fox.

The lion possessed strength. It could frighten wolves. But it could not recognize traps.

The fox could recognize traps. But it could not defend itself against wolves.

A capable leader therefore needed both: enough strength to confront obvious threats and enough perception to recognize dangers that strength alone could not solve.

Today's professional world has its own lions. Technical expertise. Long experience. Professional credentials. A reputation for getting things done.

Those capabilities remain essential. But they may not reveal the trap.

A professional can be extraordinarily good at performing work that is rapidly becoming automated.

A manager can become more efficient at coordinating a layer the organization is preparing to eliminate.

An expert can perfect a capability whose economic value is quietly declining.

A leader can climb higher inside a structure that is losing control over where opportunity is created.

Those are the strengths of the lion, and they help you compete inside the visible system. But you also need the perceptions of the fox to notice when the system itself is changing.

That is the modern version of Machiavelli's distinction.

You still need the lion. Expertise. Judgment. Discipline. The ability to deliver.

But in the Agentic Age, those qualities must be joined by structural awareness.

The lion performs. The fox sees the trap.

Machiavelli's lesson was that either one without the other eventually becomes vulnerable.

Lesson Five: Yesterday's Successful Strategy Can Become Tomorrow's Failure

Machiavelli spent years watching capable rulers succeed under one set of circumstances and then fail when those circumstances changed.

Often, the ruler had not become less intelligent. Less experienced. Less disciplined. Or less determined.

It was simply that the world had changed, but the ruler's strategy had not.

History rarely punishes effort. It punishes using yesterday's strategy after the world has moved on.

In The Prince, Machiavelli observed that one cautious leader might prosper while another equally cautious leader failed.

An aggressive leader might succeed under conditions that punished caution. But when circumstances changed, people often remained attached to the approach that had worked before. Their nature, habits, and earlier success made it difficult to change course.

That may be one of his most relevant lessons for professionals today.

Most professional careers were built inside a remarkably stable historical arrangement. Education established competence. Credentials supplied legitimacy. Employment provided access. Experience led to promotion. Titles increased authority. Institutions controlled the routes through which opportunity flowed.

For generations, that strategy worked. So, professionals became better at it. They earned another degree. Accepted greater responsibility. Learned the internal language. Built deeper expertise. Climbed higher inside the hierarchy.

None of that was foolish. It was rational behavior inside the system that existed.

But what happens when the system begins changing?

What happens when AI makes routine cognitive output abundant? When algorithms begin mediating professional visibility? When institutions flatten layers? When authority becomes portable for some and increasingly enclosed for others? When a title still exists, but the decisions once attached to it have migrated into software?

The great danger is not that professionals will stop working hard. It is that they will continue applying yesterday's successful strategy to a world organized by different rules.

Machiavelli understood how difficult that is.

The strategy that created your success becomes part of your identity. Changing it can feel like rejecting everything you spent a career proving.

But history is indifferent to that discomfort. It keeps moving. The question is no longer simply: What made me successful?

It is: Do the conditions that rewarded that strategy still exist?

Always remember, again and again, that history rarely punishes effort. It punishes using yesterday's strategy after the world has moved on.

Lesson Six: Build Before the River Rises

Machiavelli did not believe people controlled everything that happened to them. Wars began. Alliances collapsed. Leaders died. Fortune changed. Unexpected events like these could overwhelm even capable people.

But he also rejected the idea that people were powerless.

To explain the difference, he compared fortune to a flooding river. When the river rises, it sweeps away trees, buildings, roads, and anything else in its path.

Once the flood has arrived, there may be little anyone can do. But during calmer periods, people can build embankments and channels.

They cannot prevent the rain. They can prepare the ground before it comes.

That lesson feels uncomfortably current.

Professionals cannot control the speed of AI development. They cannot determine when an employer restructures. They cannot prevent a platform from changing its rules. They cannot know precisely which role, industry, or institution will be affected next.

But they can build before the river rises.

Machiavelli's river is what Veritas Silentii describes as Kairos, the Greek word for the right timing.

That important moment is not after the structure has already closed around you. It is the period before the change becomes unavoidable…while you still possess time, position, income, and freedom of movement.

Preparation always feels optional before the flood.

Afterward, it becomes urgent.

The Machiavelli Most People Never Meet

Most people remember Machiavelli as the cold political thinker who supposedly believed that the end justified the means.

He never wrote those exact words. And that familiar summary obscures much of what made his work endure.

Like many professionals today, Machiavelli was a working professional. A diplomat. A civil servant. A man who had negotiated with powerful people and watched alliances change without warning.

Then the institution that gave him position, identity, and influence disappeared. That uncomfortable possibility may feel uncomfortably familiar to many professionals today.

He wrote from the other side of that experience.

That is why his work contains something more useful than cynical advice about power.

It contains the observations of a man who had learned how quickly borrowed position could vanish. How reputation shaped opportunity. How strength could obscure the trap. How a successful strategy could become obsolete.

And why preparation mattered most before fortune changed.

Machiavelli was writing for princes. But the structure he described was much larger than a princely government. It appears whenever people operate inside unstable systems…whenever power is migrating…whenever alliances are temporary…

and whenever individuals risk confusing access to someone else's strength with strength of their own.

That is why his forgotten lessons feel so familiar today.

Machiavelli and the Agentic Age

Machiavelli would probably have embraced artificial intelligence. He would have understood its strategic value immediately.

Like us today, he would have used it to gather information. Compare adversaries. Test arguments. Draft communications. Model alternatives.

And recognize opportunities more quickly.

But he would never have mistaken access for ownership.

He would have asked who controlled the system. Who could withdraw access. Who received the attribution.

Whether its use was strengthening his own judgment…or quietly replacing it.

Whether the apparent advantage was creating independent capability…or deeper dependence.

Those remain the right questions.

AI can become an extraordinary extension of human capability. But always remember that an extension is not the same as a foundation.

Platforms can carry your ideas to an audience, but a borrowed audience is not an audience you control.

Institutions can lend authority, but institutional authority may not travel when you leave.

Algorithms can surface your work, but they can also stop surfacing it without negotiation.

Machiavelli was writing for Renaissance princes. He could never have imagined artificial intelligence, global platforms, or digital careers.

Yet from that distant past, he asks a question that has never changed.

Since eventually, every borrowed army goes home, when it does…what remains truly yours?

His guidance for the Agentic Age might therefore be surprisingly simple:

Periods of structural change reward those who patiently build capabilities they truly own — and quietly expose those who mistake borrowed advantage for lasting strength.

Continue the Exploration

Machiavelli's warning about borrowed armies is only one expression of a much larger historical pattern.

The same questions appear throughout the Veritas Silentii frameworks:

These ideas are explored more fully in Where the Ladder Ends, a field guide to understanding the forces reshaping the professional world and a practical blueprint for building resilience, authority, and independence in the emerging Agentic Age.

More Conversations Across Time

Get the Book